Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appeal by the Appellant and quashed and set aside the impugned order directing recovery of service tax, interest and penalty. The Tribunal held the impugned services to be IT-enabled services (SEO/web development) and not OIDAR, finding the provider did not own the data distributed over the internet. The payments to foreign clients were established as consideration for export of services on the basis of invoices and bank realizations, negating taxable liability under the impugned assessment. Consequently, the tax demand and ancillary charges were annulled and the appeal of the Appellant was allowed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal by the Appellant and quashed and set aside the impugned order directing recovery of service tax, interest and penalty. The Tribunal held the impugned services to be IT-enabled services (SEO/web development) and not OIDAR, finding the provider did not own the data distributed over the internet. The payments to foreign clients were established as consideration for export of services on the basis of invoices and bank realizations, negating taxable liability under the impugned assessment. Consequently, the tax demand and ancillary charges were annulled and the appeal of the Appellant was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
