Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT directed deletion of additions made by the AO that were founded solely on discrepancies between amounts in Form 26AS and the assessee's cash-basis books, concluding that entries in Form 26AS do not constitute taxable income where the assessee follows cash accounting and has furnished corroborative evidence. Specific additions relating to unidentified payers, a corporate payor, and East West Pipeline Ltd. were deleted; an invoice amount not received was also held non-taxable. A residual discrepancy of Rs.61,500 relating to Rosmerta HSRP Ventures Pvt. Ltd. was remitted to the AO for verification. The AO is directed to verify overall group receipts under the cash system, afford the assessee opportunity to be heard, and may invoke section 133(6) for fact-finding.
ITAT directed deletion of additions made by the AO that were founded solely on discrepancies between amounts in Form 26AS and the assessee's cash-basis books, concluding that entries in Form 26AS do not constitute taxable income where the assessee follows cash accounting and has furnished corroborative evidence. Specific additions relating to unidentified payers, a corporate payor, and East West Pipeline Ltd. were deleted; an invoice amount not received was also held non-taxable. A residual discrepancy of Rs.61,500 relating to Rosmerta HSRP Ventures Pvt. Ltd. was remitted to the AO for verification. The AO is directed to verify overall group receipts under the cash system, afford the assessee opportunity to be heard, and may invoke section 133(6) for fact-finding.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.