Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the petition and upheld that issuance of a consolidated show cause notice for multiple years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availment of input tax credit. The court recognized that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017, and disposed of the petition while granting the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to requisite pre-deposit(s). If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to adjudicate the challenge on its merits. The petition is disposed.
HC dismissed the petition and upheld that issuance of a consolidated show cause notice for multiple years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availment of input tax credit. The court recognized that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017, and disposed of the petition while granting the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to requisite pre-deposit(s). If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to adjudicate the challenge on its merits. The petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
