Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
HC dismissed the petition and upheld that issuance of a consolidated show cause notice for multiple years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availment of input tax credit. The court recognized that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017, and disposed of the petition while granting the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to requisite pre-deposit(s). If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to adjudicate the challenge on its merits. The petition is disposed.
HC dismissed the petition and upheld that issuance of a consolidated show cause notice for multiple years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availment of input tax credit. The court recognized that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017, and disposed of the petition while granting the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to requisite pre-deposit(s). If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to adjudicate the challenge on its merits. The petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
