Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the petition and upheld that issuance of a consolidated show cause notice for multiple years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availment of input tax credit. The court recognized that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017, and disposed of the petition while granting the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to requisite pre-deposit(s). If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to adjudicate the challenge on its merits. The petition is disposed.
HC dismissed the petition and upheld that issuance of a consolidated show cause notice for multiple years is permissible where the primary allegation is fraudulent availment of input tax credit. The court recognized that the impugned order is appealable under Section 107, CGST Act, 2017, and disposed of the petition while granting the Petitioner liberty to file an appeal by 30 September 2025 subject to requisite pre-deposit(s). If the appeal is instituted within the stipulated period, the Appellate Authority is directed not to reject it on limitation grounds but to adjudicate the challenge on its merits. The petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
