Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the term "purchase" in s. 54F(2) bears a wider connotation and is not confined to execution of a registered sale deed or actual possession; a liberal construction is warranted to effectuate the fiscal object of allowing rollover relief on reinvestment in residential property. The assessee's claim for exemption under s. 54F was upheld. Because the assessee's investment in the new residential house within the prescribed period was less than the net sale consideration of the original capital assets, the AO was directed to compute exemption pro rata: allow exemption in the proportion that the cost of the new house (investment made within the stipulated period) bears to the net sale consideration.
ITAT held that the term "purchase" in s. 54F(2) bears a wider connotation and is not confined to execution of a registered sale deed or actual possession; a liberal construction is warranted to effectuate the fiscal object of allowing rollover relief on reinvestment in residential property. The assessee's claim for exemption under s. 54F was upheld. Because the assessee's investment in the new residential house within the prescribed period was less than the net sale consideration of the original capital assets, the AO was directed to compute exemption pro rata: allow exemption in the proportion that the cost of the new house (investment made within the stipulated period) bears to the net sale consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
