Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the assessment orders dated 29.12.2017 are barred by limitation and void ab initio. The Department failed to discharge the burden of proving dispatch within the statutory period under s.153B, producing only a speed post slip dated 01.01.2018 and no dispatch register entries or postal booking receipts. Service effected via a notice server on 09.01.2018 to an unrelated third party was held irregular and not a valid service in law, contrary to s.282 and Rule 127 of the Income-tax Rules. In consequence, the impugned assessment orders were invalidly issued/served and the appeals of the assessee were allowed.
ITAT held that the assessment orders dated 29.12.2017 are barred by limitation and void ab initio. The Department failed to discharge the burden of proving dispatch within the statutory period under s.153B, producing only a speed post slip dated 01.01.2018 and no dispatch register entries or postal booking receipts. Service effected via a notice server on 09.01.2018 to an unrelated third party was held irregular and not a valid service in law, contrary to s.282 and Rule 127 of the Income-tax Rules. In consequence, the impugned assessment orders were invalidly issued/served and the appeals of the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
