Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10161 to 10180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC granted the writ petition, directing provisional release of the impugned second-hand digital multifunction devices (MFDs) subject to conditions under the Customs Act, 1962. Relying on precedent that MFDs prima facie qualify as highly specialised equipment (HSEs) and are provisionally releasable, the court ordered the Customs authority at Chennai to pass orders for provisional release within four weeks and to release the goods within two weeks after the petitioner fulfils imposed conditions. The HC rejected the respondents' contention that the goods are conclusively restricted or prohibited at the provisional stage. The petition is disposed of.
The HC granted the writ petition, directing provisional release of the impugned second-hand digital multifunction devices (MFDs) subject to conditions under the Customs Act, 1962. Relying on precedent that MFDs prima facie qualify as highly specialised equipment (HSEs) and are provisionally releasable, the court ordered the Customs authority at Chennai to pass orders for provisional release within four weeks and to release the goods within two weeks after the petitioner fulfils imposed conditions. The HC rejected the respondents' contention that the goods are conclusively restricted or prohibited at the provisional stage. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.