Donor-directed corpus contributions retain capital character despite exemption claims under section 10(23C)(vi), preventing their treatment as taxable...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's directive requiring the appellant to lift the lien and release a fixed deposit of Rs.27.60 crores (with interest) held in the name of the corporate debtor. The Tribunal held the appellant's refusal to release the FD on account of alleged dues of a related group company was unjustified: the lien letter authorised retention only for amounts due from the corporate debtor itself, singly or jointly, and no facility existed against which the corporate debtor was liable. Consequently, the Adjudicating Authority's order was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT affirmed the Adjudicating Authority's directive requiring the appellant to lift the lien and release a fixed deposit of Rs.27.60 crores (with interest) held in the name of the corporate debtor. The Tribunal held the appellant's refusal to release the FD on account of alleged dues of a related group company was unjustified: the lien letter authorised retention only for amounts due from the corporate debtor itself, singly or jointly, and no facility existed against which the corporate debtor was liable. Consequently, the Adjudicating Authority's order was upheld and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.