Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.