Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
