Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
The HC quashed and set aside the impugned order denying the petitioner's refund claim for IGST paid under Entry No.10 of N/N.10/2017-IGST, directing respondent authorities to pass a fresh de novo order granting refund of the IGST paid, with appropriate interest, in light of the Apex Court's ruling declaring the notification unconstitutional. The HC noted respondent verification of credit reversal through Form GST DRC-03 and found the reversal appropriate. The respondents are ordered to complete the reassessment and sanction the refund within 12 weeks from receipt of this order. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
