Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable insofar as an alternative statutory remedy exists and the impugned order is appealable under Section 107. The court noted material suggesting the petitioner's GST registration was recent and that the entity may have been constituted to fraudulently avail ineligible input tax credit via fake, non-existent suppliers; business operations ceased following the petitioner's arrest. The petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice was found unpersuasive. Although the petition was filed within the limitation period, the period for appeal has lapsed; accordingly the HC permitted the petitioner to institute the statutory appeal by 15 December 2025 subject to depositing the requisite pre-deposit, and disposed of the petition.
HC dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable insofar as an alternative statutory remedy exists and the impugned order is appealable under Section 107. The court noted material suggesting the petitioner's GST registration was recent and that the entity may have been constituted to fraudulently avail ineligible input tax credit via fake, non-existent suppliers; business operations ceased following the petitioner's arrest. The petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice was found unpersuasive. Although the petition was filed within the limitation period, the period for appeal has lapsed; accordingly the HC permitted the petitioner to institute the statutory appeal by 15 December 2025 subject to depositing the requisite pre-deposit, and disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
