Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
HC dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable insofar as an alternative statutory remedy exists and the impugned order is appealable under Section 107. The court noted material suggesting the petitioner's GST registration was recent and that the entity may have been constituted to fraudulently avail ineligible input tax credit via fake, non-existent suppliers; business operations ceased following the petitioner's arrest. The petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice was found unpersuasive. Although the petition was filed within the limitation period, the period for appeal has lapsed; accordingly the HC permitted the petitioner to institute the statutory appeal by 15 December 2025 subject to depositing the requisite pre-deposit, and disposed of the petition.
HC dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable insofar as an alternative statutory remedy exists and the impugned order is appealable under Section 107. The court noted material suggesting the petitioner's GST registration was recent and that the entity may have been constituted to fraudulently avail ineligible input tax credit via fake, non-existent suppliers; business operations ceased following the petitioner's arrest. The petitioner's reply to the show-cause notice was found unpersuasive. Although the petition was filed within the limitation period, the period for appeal has lapsed; accordingly the HC permitted the petitioner to institute the statutory appeal by 15 December 2025 subject to depositing the requisite pre-deposit, and disposed of the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
