Petition dismissed; petitioner allowed to submit detailed disclosures and documents for re-consideration; notices for 2019-23 may be adjudicated on me...
Confiscation and duty recovery quashed where licensing records show export obligation discharged; customs lacks jurisdiction absent licence annulment ...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10161 to 10180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition and directed Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to pay interest on the delayed refund to the petitioner, holding that technical system defects, not any fault of the petitioner in filing the shipping bills or GST returns, caused the delay. The court found section 56 of the GST Act mandates compensatory interest where a refund is not granted within the statutory period under section 54(5), and therefore interest accrues from the relevant statutory date. The respondents were ordered to compute and disburse the interest in accordance with law within 12 weeks from receipt of the order, and the petition was allowed.
The HC allowed the petition and directed Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to pay interest on the delayed refund to the petitioner, holding that technical system defects, not any fault of the petitioner in filing the shipping bills or GST returns, caused the delay. The court found section 56 of the GST Act mandates compensatory interest where a refund is not granted within the statutory period under section 54(5), and therefore interest accrues from the relevant statutory date. The respondents were ordered to compute and disburse the interest in accordance with law within 12 weeks from receipt of the order, and the petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
