Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the GST MOV-11 order confirming penalty and fine and cancellation of GST registration, holding it will not entertain the writ in view of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under s.107 of the GST Act. The court declined to adjudicate merits regarding alleged bogus transactions, fake tax invoices, E-way bills and purported non-existence at the registered address, and relegated the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The HC made no adjudication on merits, but held that the period already elapsed shall be treated as bona fide for condonation of delay if the petitioner institutes an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the GST MOV-11 order confirming penalty and fine and cancellation of GST registration, holding it will not entertain the writ in view of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under s.107 of the GST Act. The court declined to adjudicate merits regarding alleged bogus transactions, fake tax invoices, E-way bills and purported non-existence at the registered address, and relegated the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The HC made no adjudication on merits, but held that the period already elapsed shall be treated as bona fide for condonation of delay if the petitioner institutes an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
