Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the GST MOV-11 order confirming penalty and fine and cancellation of GST registration, holding it will not entertain the writ in view of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under s.107 of the GST Act. The court declined to adjudicate merits regarding alleged bogus transactions, fake tax invoices, E-way bills and purported non-existence at the registered address, and relegated the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The HC made no adjudication on merits, but held that the period already elapsed shall be treated as bona fide for condonation of delay if the petitioner institutes an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the GST MOV-11 order confirming penalty and fine and cancellation of GST registration, holding it will not entertain the writ in view of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under s.107 of the GST Act. The court declined to adjudicate merits regarding alleged bogus transactions, fake tax invoices, E-way bills and purported non-existence at the registered address, and relegated the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The HC made no adjudication on merits, but held that the period already elapsed shall be treated as bona fide for condonation of delay if the petitioner institutes an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
