Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the GST MOV-11 order confirming penalty and fine and cancellation of GST registration, holding it will not entertain the writ in view of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under s.107 of the GST Act. The court declined to adjudicate merits regarding alleged bogus transactions, fake tax invoices, E-way bills and purported non-existence at the registered address, and relegated the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The HC made no adjudication on merits, but held that the period already elapsed shall be treated as bona fide for condonation of delay if the petitioner institutes an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks.
The HC dismissed the petition challenging the GST MOV-11 order confirming penalty and fine and cancellation of GST registration, holding it will not entertain the writ in view of an alternative efficacious statutory remedy under s.107 of the GST Act. The court declined to adjudicate merits regarding alleged bogus transactions, fake tax invoices, E-way bills and purported non-existence at the registered address, and relegated the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. The HC made no adjudication on merits, but held that the period already elapsed shall be treated as bona fide for condonation of delay if the petitioner institutes an appeal before the appellate authority within two weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
