Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that assessing officers acted on software-generated data without requisite application of mind, initiating proceedings against entities (including a merged bank and deceased/amalgamated persons) based on unverified, potentially erroneous PAN entries, thereby causing high-pitched, avoidable litigation; the Department was found to be treating the software as master rather than a tool and has undertaken corrective measures. The petition was disposed of, administrative proceedings against the AOs reserved, and the previously levied exemplary cost of Rs. 1 crore was reduced: respondent nos.1 and 2 were directed to pay Rs. 10,000 each (total) to the State Legal Services Authority as token costs.
The HC held that assessing officers acted on software-generated data without requisite application of mind, initiating proceedings against entities (including a merged bank and deceased/amalgamated persons) based on unverified, potentially erroneous PAN entries, thereby causing high-pitched, avoidable litigation; the Department was found to be treating the software as master rather than a tool and has undertaken corrective measures. The petition was disposed of, administrative proceedings against the AOs reserved, and the previously levied exemplary cost of Rs. 1 crore was reduced: respondent nos.1 and 2 were directed to pay Rs. 10,000 each (total) to the State Legal Services Authority as token costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
