Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld that a unilateral APA, covering AYs 2016-17 to 2020-21 and rolled back to AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16, applies to AY 2013-14 for the issue of reimbursement of AMP expenses; accordingly, appeals of the assessee and revenue on that issue were dismissed. On alleged TDS defaults under s.195 and consequent disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for payments to non-residents, the ITAT found material facts regarding the nature of services, cost-plus markup and the "make available" contention were not on record; the claims warranted re-verification. The ITAT set aside the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders and remitted the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
The ITAT upheld that a unilateral APA, covering AYs 2016-17 to 2020-21 and rolled back to AYs 2012-13 to 2015-16, applies to AY 2013-14 for the issue of reimbursement of AMP expenses; accordingly, appeals of the assessee and revenue on that issue were dismissed. On alleged TDS defaults under s.195 and consequent disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for payments to non-residents, the ITAT found material facts regarding the nature of services, cost-plus markup and the "make available" contention were not on record; the claims warranted re-verification. The ITAT set aside the AO's and CIT(A)'s orders and remitted the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.