Export obligation removed by notification, customs duty demand invalidated; penalties under s.112 and s.114AA quashed due to inadmissible s.108 statem...
Customs officers must wear and use department-issued body-worn cameras when clearing passenger baggage, with daily secure transfer and 30-day retentio...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
10041 to 10060 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the assessing officer must compute tax liability on the addition under section 69A at the 30% rate prescribed by the pre-amended section 115BBE, rejecting application of the post-amendment 60% rate; the Tribunal followed the reasoning of its coordinate bench and applied precedent to direct reassessment consistent with the pre-amendment regime. The AO is directed to determine tax on the specified addition accordingly, with consequential adjustments as necessary. The additional ground invoked by the assessee is allowed and the matter is remitted for computation and assessment in accordance with this direction.
The ITAT held that the assessing officer must compute tax liability on the addition under section 69A at the 30% rate prescribed by the pre-amended section 115BBE, rejecting application of the post-amendment 60% rate; the Tribunal followed the reasoning of its coordinate bench and applied precedent to direct reassessment consistent with the pre-amendment regime. The AO is directed to determine tax on the specified addition accordingly, with consequential adjustments as necessary. The additional ground invoked by the assessee is allowed and the matter is remitted for computation and assessment in accordance with this direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.