Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that, pursuant to s.199(3) read with r.37BA, TDS credit must be granted to the person on whose payment the tax was deducted where the deduction is reflected in Form 26AS; consequently the appellant, being the agent who had payments reflected in Form 26AS, is entitled to credit of the full TDS so reflected. The tribunal further held that the r.37BA(2) declaration mechanism is directory not mandatory, and commercial exigencies justified non-issuance of declarations to the foreign principal. In absence of any Revenue contention on understatement of income or audit qualification, the balance TDS credit claimed by the appellant was allowed.
The ITAT held that, pursuant to s.199(3) read with r.37BA, TDS credit must be granted to the person on whose payment the tax was deducted where the deduction is reflected in Form 26AS; consequently the appellant, being the agent who had payments reflected in Form 26AS, is entitled to credit of the full TDS so reflected. The tribunal further held that the r.37BA(2) declaration mechanism is directory not mandatory, and commercial exigencies justified non-issuance of declarations to the foreign principal. In absence of any Revenue contention on understatement of income or audit qualification, the balance TDS credit claimed by the appellant was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.