Penalty on exchange vacated for lack of evidence that exchange authorized subsidiaries' investments; Regulations 43(1) 2012 and 38(2) 2018 inapplicabl...
Petitioner not an eligible assessee under s.144C(15)(b); draft and final assessments under s.144C(1)/s.143(3)/s.144B quashed and penalty show-cause no...
The ITAT held that, pursuant to s.199(3) read with r.37BA, TDS credit must be granted to the person on whose payment the tax was deducted where the deduction is reflected in Form 26AS; consequently the appellant, being the agent who had payments reflected in Form 26AS, is entitled to credit of the full TDS so reflected. The tribunal further held that the r.37BA(2) declaration mechanism is directory not mandatory, and commercial exigencies justified non-issuance of declarations to the foreign principal. In absence of any Revenue contention on understatement of income or audit qualification, the balance TDS credit claimed by the appellant was allowed.
The ITAT held that, pursuant to s.199(3) read with r.37BA, TDS credit must be granted to the person on whose payment the tax was deducted where the deduction is reflected in Form 26AS; consequently the appellant, being the agent who had payments reflected in Form 26AS, is entitled to credit of the full TDS so reflected. The tribunal further held that the r.37BA(2) declaration mechanism is directory not mandatory, and commercial exigencies justified non-issuance of declarations to the foreign principal. In absence of any Revenue contention on understatement of income or audit qualification, the balance TDS credit claimed by the appellant was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
