Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT remanded the transfer-pricing issues to the file of the AO/TPO for fresh benchmarking of international transactions, holding that key contentions raised by the assessee regarding pricing and comparability were raised for the first time on appeal and require reconsideration; grounds 2-8 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to permit interest disallowance under the proviso to s.36(1) to be treated as revenue expenditure in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal also held that contested advertisement expenditure is revenue in nature and allowed the corresponding ground of appeal.
ITAT remanded the transfer-pricing issues to the file of the AO/TPO for fresh benchmarking of international transactions, holding that key contentions raised by the assessee regarding pricing and comparability were raised for the first time on appeal and require reconsideration; grounds 2-8 were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to permit interest disallowance under the proviso to s.36(1) to be treated as revenue expenditure in favour of the assessee. The Tribunal also held that contested advertisement expenditure is revenue in nature and allowed the corresponding ground of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
