Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the ex-gratia lump-sum received on closure of the employer's unit constituted voluntary payment and, on the facts, did not form part of salary nor represented compensation taxable under section 17(3); accordingly the sum was not exigible to tax as profits in lieu of salary. The AO's reliance on the CBDT circular to disallow exemption claimed under section 10 was set aside, the addition deleted and the order of the lower authority reversed. The Tribunal found precedent on identical facts supported treating the payment as non-compensatory, permitting exemption treatment and granting relief to the assessee.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the ex-gratia lump-sum received on closure of the employer's unit constituted voluntary payment and, on the facts, did not form part of salary nor represented compensation taxable under section 17(3); accordingly the sum was not exigible to tax as profits in lieu of salary. The AO's reliance on the CBDT circular to disallow exemption claimed under section 10 was set aside, the addition deleted and the order of the lower authority reversed. The Tribunal found precedent on identical facts supported treating the payment as non-compensatory, permitting exemption treatment and granting relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.