Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC quashed the impugned reopening and notices under Secs. 147/148, holding that no escapement of income occurred in the return for AY 2014-15 and that subsequent events (JDA) could only trigger recomputation/amendment under Sec. 155(7B) and withdrawal of exemption under Sec. 47A - not assessment reopening. The court found the transferee consistently treated and paid tax on the asset as a capital asset; Revenue cannot adopt a contrary stance in respect of the transferor to classify the same transaction as stock-in-trade. Rectification under Sec. 154 differs from recomputation under Sec. 155(7B). Proceedings under Sec. 155(7B) were time-barred; relief granted to the transferor.
HC quashed the impugned reopening and notices under Secs. 147/148, holding that no escapement of income occurred in the return for AY 2014-15 and that subsequent events (JDA) could only trigger recomputation/amendment under Sec. 155(7B) and withdrawal of exemption under Sec. 47A - not assessment reopening. The court found the transferee consistently treated and paid tax on the asset as a capital asset; Revenue cannot adopt a contrary stance in respect of the transferor to classify the same transaction as stock-in-trade. Rectification under Sec. 154 differs from recomputation under Sec. 155(7B). Proceedings under Sec. 155(7B) were time-barred; relief granted to the transferor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.