Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition under s.56(2)(viib) in respect of alleged excess share premium. The Tribunal held that the assessee validly exercised its statutory option to adopt the DCF method under Rule 11UA(2)(b) for valuation of unquoted shares, and the AO and CIT(A) lacked jurisdiction to substitute a different valuation. The Tribunal found the assessee's valuation justified and in accordance with law, set aside the impugned additions, and directed that the excess share premium be excluded from income. Appeal of the assessee is allowed.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and deleted the addition under s.56(2)(viib) in respect of alleged excess share premium. The Tribunal held that the assessee validly exercised its statutory option to adopt the DCF method under Rule 11UA(2)(b) for valuation of unquoted shares, and the AO and CIT(A) lacked jurisdiction to substitute a different valuation. The Tribunal found the assessee's valuation justified and in accordance with law, set aside the impugned additions, and directed that the excess share premium be excluded from income. Appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.