Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held for the assessee that deduction under s.80IC is allowable for the Rudrapur unit: the Tribunal found substantial manufacturing processes and value-addition at Rudrapur, accepted inter-unit transfer pricing and prior excise/service tax registrations as indicia of manufacture, and deleted the AO's protective disallowance. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s apportionment findings that unit-wise books reflect separate expenses (no cross-charging except minimal audit fee) and affirmed that only the eligible unit's profit/loss is to be considered when computing s.80IC. Deduction under s.80IA for windmill, though claimed during assessment, was allowed. Claims relating to late payment of PF and ESI were dismissed as covered adversely by binding precedent.
ITAT held for the assessee that deduction under s.80IC is allowable for the Rudrapur unit: the Tribunal found substantial manufacturing processes and value-addition at Rudrapur, accepted inter-unit transfer pricing and prior excise/service tax registrations as indicia of manufacture, and deleted the AO's protective disallowance. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s apportionment findings that unit-wise books reflect separate expenses (no cross-charging except minimal audit fee) and affirmed that only the eligible unit's profit/loss is to be considered when computing s.80IC. Deduction under s.80IA for windmill, though claimed during assessment, was allowed. Claims relating to late payment of PF and ESI were dismissed as covered adversely by binding precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.