Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held for the assessee that deduction under s.80IC is allowable for the Rudrapur unit: the Tribunal found substantial manufacturing processes and value-addition at Rudrapur, accepted inter-unit transfer pricing and prior excise/service tax registrations as indicia of manufacture, and deleted the AO's protective disallowance. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s apportionment findings that unit-wise books reflect separate expenses (no cross-charging except minimal audit fee) and affirmed that only the eligible unit's profit/loss is to be considered when computing s.80IC. Deduction under s.80IA for windmill, though claimed during assessment, was allowed. Claims relating to late payment of PF and ESI were dismissed as covered adversely by binding precedent.
ITAT held for the assessee that deduction under s.80IC is allowable for the Rudrapur unit: the Tribunal found substantial manufacturing processes and value-addition at Rudrapur, accepted inter-unit transfer pricing and prior excise/service tax registrations as indicia of manufacture, and deleted the AO's protective disallowance. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s apportionment findings that unit-wise books reflect separate expenses (no cross-charging except minimal audit fee) and affirmed that only the eligible unit's profit/loss is to be considered when computing s.80IC. Deduction under s.80IA for windmill, though claimed during assessment, was allowed. Claims relating to late payment of PF and ESI were dismissed as covered adversely by binding precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.