Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
ITAT held for the assessee that deduction under s.80IC is allowable for the Rudrapur unit: the Tribunal found substantial manufacturing processes and value-addition at Rudrapur, accepted inter-unit transfer pricing and prior excise/service tax registrations as indicia of manufacture, and deleted the AO's protective disallowance. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s apportionment findings that unit-wise books reflect separate expenses (no cross-charging except minimal audit fee) and affirmed that only the eligible unit's profit/loss is to be considered when computing s.80IC. Deduction under s.80IA for windmill, though claimed during assessment, was allowed. Claims relating to late payment of PF and ESI were dismissed as covered adversely by binding precedent.
ITAT held for the assessee that deduction under s.80IC is allowable for the Rudrapur unit: the Tribunal found substantial manufacturing processes and value-addition at Rudrapur, accepted inter-unit transfer pricing and prior excise/service tax registrations as indicia of manufacture, and deleted the AO's protective disallowance. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s apportionment findings that unit-wise books reflect separate expenses (no cross-charging except minimal audit fee) and affirmed that only the eligible unit's profit/loss is to be considered when computing s.80IC. Deduction under s.80IA for windmill, though claimed during assessment, was allowed. Claims relating to late payment of PF and ESI were dismissed as covered adversely by binding precedent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.