Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC permitted the Petitioner to refrain from pressing its challenge to the impugned notification and authorised the Petitioner to institute an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 November 2025 to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be entertained and adjudicated on merits and shall not be regarded as barred by limitation; the Appellate Authority is directed to pass a reasoned order. The Petitioner may advance all grounds and rely on any documents in the appeal. The petition is disposed of.
The HC permitted the Petitioner to refrain from pressing its challenge to the impugned notification and authorised the Petitioner to institute an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The Petitioner is granted time until 15 November 2025 to file the appeal with the requisite pre-deposit. If filed within the stipulated period, the appeal shall be entertained and adjudicated on merits and shall not be regarded as barred by limitation; the Appellate Authority is directed to pass a reasoned order. The Petitioner may advance all grounds and rely on any documents in the appeal. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.