Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the revisional order dated 22 July 2024 is vitiated by want of valid service of the show-cause notice dated 1 July 2024 and by a consequent breach of the principles of natural justice; accordingly, the impugned revisional order is set aside. The court confined its decision to the procedural defect and permitted the Respondent to proceed afresh with the show-cause proceedings: to effect valid service of the 1 July 2024 notice, afford the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing, and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The petition is allowed; the show-cause notice was not annexed to the Respondent's replies.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the revisional order dated 22 July 2024 is vitiated by want of valid service of the show-cause notice dated 1 July 2024 and by a consequent breach of the principles of natural justice; accordingly, the impugned revisional order is set aside. The court confined its decision to the procedural defect and permitted the Respondent to proceed afresh with the show-cause proceedings: to effect valid service of the 1 July 2024 notice, afford the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing, and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The petition is allowed; the show-cause notice was not annexed to the Respondent's replies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.