Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2981 to 3000 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the revisional order dated 22 July 2024 is vitiated by want of valid service of the show-cause notice dated 1 July 2024 and by a consequent breach of the principles of natural justice; accordingly, the impugned revisional order is set aside. The court confined its decision to the procedural defect and permitted the Respondent to proceed afresh with the show-cause proceedings: to effect valid service of the 1 July 2024 notice, afford the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing, and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The petition is allowed; the show-cause notice was not annexed to the Respondent's replies.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the revisional order dated 22 July 2024 is vitiated by want of valid service of the show-cause notice dated 1 July 2024 and by a consequent breach of the principles of natural justice; accordingly, the impugned revisional order is set aside. The court confined its decision to the procedural defect and permitted the Respondent to proceed afresh with the show-cause proceedings: to effect valid service of the 1 July 2024 notice, afford the Petitioner an opportunity of hearing, and thereafter pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. The petition is allowed; the show-cause notice was not annexed to the Respondent's replies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.