All appeals dismissed; finding of anti-competitive bid-rigging upheld under Sections 3(3)(c), 3(3)(d) read with 3(1); cease-and-desist and total-turno...
Central Government notifies 11.541-hectare Special Economic Zone for semiconductor manufacturing; Approval Committee constituted, ICD status effective...
Government appoints National Customs Targeting Centre-Passenger director as customs officer with powers under PNR Regulations, 2022 and Sections 30A, ...
The HC held that the impugned assessment was vitiated by breach of natural justice because the petitioner was not given an opportunity to show cause in respect of the impugned additions: the assessment did not record an unexplained bank credit under s.69A but instead treated payments for two immovable property purchases as unexplained, and an income addition under s.56(2)(x) was also not raised in the Show Cause Notice. Consequently, the HC set aside the assessment order, the demand notice and the penalty notices, and remanded the matter to the AO to issue a fresh show cause notice and thereafter proceed afresh to its logical conclusion.
The HC held that the impugned assessment was vitiated by breach of natural justice because the petitioner was not given an opportunity to show cause in respect of the impugned additions: the assessment did not record an unexplained bank credit under s.69A but instead treated payments for two immovable property purchases as unexplained, and an income addition under s.56(2)(x) was also not raised in the Show Cause Notice. Consequently, the HC set aside the assessment order, the demand notice and the penalty notices, and remanded the matter to the AO to issue a fresh show cause notice and thereafter proceed afresh to its logical conclusion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
