Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the orders of the lower authorities, holding that provisions of section 194H read with sections 201 and 201(1A) were not attracted for AY 2015-16. The Tribunal found no principal-agent relationship between the assessee and the payment gateway operators (CC Avenues and Zaaki payment services), treated the transactions as outside the scope of commission liable to TDS, and relied on relevant judicial precedent and CBDT instruction. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned demand under sections 201 and 201(1A) and allowed all grounds of appeal raised by the assessee.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the orders of the lower authorities, holding that provisions of section 194H read with sections 201 and 201(1A) were not attracted for AY 2015-16. The Tribunal found no principal-agent relationship between the assessee and the payment gateway operators (CC Avenues and Zaaki payment services), treated the transactions as outside the scope of commission liable to TDS, and relied on relevant judicial precedent and CBDT instruction. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned demand under sections 201 and 201(1A) and allowed all grounds of appeal raised by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.