Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the orders of the lower authorities, holding that provisions of section 194H read with sections 201 and 201(1A) were not attracted for AY 2015-16. The Tribunal found no principal-agent relationship between the assessee and the payment gateway operators (CC Avenues and Zaaki payment services), treated the transactions as outside the scope of commission liable to TDS, and relied on relevant judicial precedent and CBDT instruction. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned demand under sections 201 and 201(1A) and allowed all grounds of appeal raised by the assessee.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the orders of the lower authorities, holding that provisions of section 194H read with sections 201 and 201(1A) were not attracted for AY 2015-16. The Tribunal found no principal-agent relationship between the assessee and the payment gateway operators (CC Avenues and Zaaki payment services), treated the transactions as outside the scope of commission liable to TDS, and relied on relevant judicial precedent and CBDT instruction. The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned demand under sections 201 and 201(1A) and allowed all grounds of appeal raised by the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.