Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT, applying the SC precedent, held that where an assessee deducted TDS but remitted it belatedly with interest, penalty under s.271C is not leviable because "failure to deposit" cannot be equated with "failure to deduct." Conversely, where non-deduction under s.194A is alleged, facts must be examined, including claims of financial difficulty and subsequent compliance. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and restored the matter to the file of the AO for limited purpose: verification of primary evidence (challans, Form 26Q, ledger extracts and corresponding interest payments) to determine whether deduction occurred and belated remittance followed. Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
ITAT, applying the SC precedent, held that where an assessee deducted TDS but remitted it belatedly with interest, penalty under s.271C is not leviable because "failure to deposit" cannot be equated with "failure to deduct." Conversely, where non-deduction under s.194A is alleged, facts must be examined, including claims of financial difficulty and subsequent compliance. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and restored the matter to the file of the AO for limited purpose: verification of primary evidence (challans, Form 26Q, ledger extracts and corresponding interest payments) to determine whether deduction occurred and belated remittance followed. Appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.