Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, holding that receipts characterized as marketing, distribution marketing, frequency marketing programme and SCHI facility charges do not constitute royalty, FTS or FIS under s.9(1)(vii) or Article 12(4)(a) of the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal applied the consistency doctrine, noting unchanged facts and prior favourable tribunal orders in the assessee's own cases, and found no material warranting a different conclusion for the impugned year. Similarly, amounts billed as travel agent commission for bookings of third-party Indian hotels were held not to be managerial, technical or consultancy fees and thus not taxable as FTS/FIS. All contested additions were therefore deleted.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals, holding that receipts characterized as marketing, distribution marketing, frequency marketing programme and SCHI facility charges do not constitute royalty, FTS or FIS under s.9(1)(vii) or Article 12(4)(a) of the India-USA DTAA. The Tribunal applied the consistency doctrine, noting unchanged facts and prior favourable tribunal orders in the assessee's own cases, and found no material warranting a different conclusion for the impugned year. Similarly, amounts billed as travel agent commission for bookings of third-party Indian hotels were held not to be managerial, technical or consultancy fees and thus not taxable as FTS/FIS. All contested additions were therefore deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.