Penny-stock additions require transaction-specific evidence; general investigation material alone cannot establish undisclosed income or accommodation...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivable...
Section 153C satisfaction and seized electronic records sustained unexplained-investment addition, subject to proportionate ownership-share verificati...
The Supreme Court upheld a resolution plan worth Rs 19,700 crore by the successful resolution applicant for a corporate debtor, rejecting appeals by its former promoters and finding they engaged in systematic delay tactics to thwart the corporate insolvency resolution process. The court affirmed earlier NCLAT and NCLT findings that the erstwhile management showed lackluster participation, filed multiple frivolous applications across forums, and attended Committee of Creditors meetings minimally; the NCLT had imposed costs on them. The judgment also preserved immunity from prosecution by the investigative agency for the successful resolution applicant.
The Supreme Court upheld a resolution plan worth Rs 19,700 crore by the successful resolution applicant for a corporate debtor, rejecting appeals by its former promoters and finding they engaged in systematic delay tactics to thwart the corporate insolvency resolution process. The court affirmed earlier NCLAT and NCLT findings that the erstwhile management showed lackluster participation, filed multiple frivolous applications across forums, and attended Committee of Creditors meetings minimally; the NCLT had imposed costs on them. The judgment also preserved immunity from prosecution by the investigative agency for the successful resolution applicant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.