Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that initiation of proceedings under s.153C against the assessee was invalid for failure to record the prerequisite satisfaction by the assessing officer of the searched third party; the sole basis for action was documents seized from that third party and the AO's satisfaction is a jurisdictional pre-condition. Revenue failed to produce the requisite satisfaction note despite repeated requests, and the process mandated by the CBDT guidance was not followed. Consequently, the assessment order framed under s.153C read with s.143(3) was quashed and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
ITAT held that initiation of proceedings under s.153C against the assessee was invalid for failure to record the prerequisite satisfaction by the assessing officer of the searched third party; the sole basis for action was documents seized from that third party and the AO's satisfaction is a jurisdictional pre-condition. Revenue failed to produce the requisite satisfaction note despite repeated requests, and the process mandated by the CBDT guidance was not followed. Consequently, the assessment order framed under s.153C read with s.143(3) was quashed and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.