Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held that the consideration for transfer of transferable development rights (TDR) constitutes income from sale of development rights and falls within the ambit of Section 65(B)(44), but such TDR amounts to an interest in immovable property and thus attracts the exclusion in Section 65(B)(44)(a)(i); the tribunal found the collaboration agreement evidenced an ultimate transfer of land/title, placing the transaction outside the levy of service tax. The impugned assessment/order was quashed and the appeal allowed, with no requirement to adjudicate remaining contentions.
CESTAT held that the consideration for transfer of transferable development rights (TDR) constitutes income from sale of development rights and falls within the ambit of Section 65(B)(44), but such TDR amounts to an interest in immovable property and thus attracts the exclusion in Section 65(B)(44)(a)(i); the tribunal found the collaboration agreement evidenced an ultimate transfer of land/title, placing the transaction outside the levy of service tax. The impugned assessment/order was quashed and the appeal allowed, with no requirement to adjudicate remaining contentions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.