Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the S.T. Tribunal's remand order, holding that the movements from the appellant's Rourkela Plant to its branches constituted stock transfers and not inter-State sales under s.3(a) of the CST Act. The Tribunal's contrary findings were held to be inconsistent with the earlier findings of the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority (CSTAA), which were binding following remand. CSTAA had found the TBS Scheme did not itself constitute an offer or agreement of sale, that offer letters were issued post-despatch, and that branch shipments were bulk transfers under plant documents with branches free to dispose of goods. Consequently the S.T. Tribunal's order of 29.06.2018 was quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the S.T. Tribunal's remand order, holding that the movements from the appellant's Rourkela Plant to its branches constituted stock transfers and not inter-State sales under s.3(a) of the CST Act. The Tribunal's contrary findings were held to be inconsistent with the earlier findings of the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority (CSTAA), which were binding following remand. CSTAA had found the TBS Scheme did not itself constitute an offer or agreement of sale, that offer letters were issued post-despatch, and that branch shipments were bulk transfers under plant documents with branches free to dispose of goods. Consequently the S.T. Tribunal's order of 29.06.2018 was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
