Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the impugned bail order dated 07.06.2025 was unsustainable and therefore set aside and quashed. The Court distinguished between cancellation and setting aside of bail, exercised jurisdiction under the relevant provisions invoked, and found the Authorization to Arrest and Grounds of Arrest adequately disclosed prima facie materials of fraudulent availment of substantial ineligible ITC against the respondents. The arrest on 05.06.2025 was held lawful and compliant with statutory mandates and administrative guidelines; deficiencies in the notice to relatives did not prejudice the respondents who were represented at bail hearings. Petition allowed; impugned order set aside and quashed.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the impugned bail order dated 07.06.2025 was unsustainable and therefore set aside and quashed. The Court distinguished between cancellation and setting aside of bail, exercised jurisdiction under the relevant provisions invoked, and found the Authorization to Arrest and Grounds of Arrest adequately disclosed prima facie materials of fraudulent availment of substantial ineligible ITC against the respondents. The arrest on 05.06.2025 was held lawful and compliant with statutory mandates and administrative guidelines; deficiencies in the notice to relatives did not prejudice the respondents who were represented at bail hearings. Petition allowed; impugned order set aside and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
