Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the impugned bail order dated 07.06.2025 was unsustainable and therefore set aside and quashed. The Court distinguished between cancellation and setting aside of bail, exercised jurisdiction under the relevant provisions invoked, and found the Authorization to Arrest and Grounds of Arrest adequately disclosed prima facie materials of fraudulent availment of substantial ineligible ITC against the respondents. The arrest on 05.06.2025 was held lawful and compliant with statutory mandates and administrative guidelines; deficiencies in the notice to relatives did not prejudice the respondents who were represented at bail hearings. Petition allowed; impugned order set aside and quashed.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that the impugned bail order dated 07.06.2025 was unsustainable and therefore set aside and quashed. The Court distinguished between cancellation and setting aside of bail, exercised jurisdiction under the relevant provisions invoked, and found the Authorization to Arrest and Grounds of Arrest adequately disclosed prima facie materials of fraudulent availment of substantial ineligible ITC against the respondents. The arrest on 05.06.2025 was held lawful and compliant with statutory mandates and administrative guidelines; deficiencies in the notice to relatives did not prejudice the respondents who were represented at bail hearings. Petition allowed; impugned order set aside and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.