Charitable trust income application permits verified capital expenditure but rejects deferred pre-operative claims and requires reconsideration of con...
Reinsurance premium deductions require established regulatory breaches, while independently acquired software qualifies within the computer depreciati...
Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.