Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.