Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.