Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
HC set aside the order-in-appeal dated 20.06.2025 on the ground that the appellate authority failed to consider or discuss the grounds raised in the memo of appeal, constituting a violation of the principles of natural justice and rendering the impugned order reasonless. The matter is remitted to the appellate authority for decision by a fresh, reasoned order in accordance with law. The petitioner is directed to appear before the appellate authority on 06.10.2025. The petition is disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.