Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT held that revision under s. 263 by the PCIT was unwarranted where the AO had conducted adequate inquiry and taken a permissible view regarding agricultural receipts and expenditures, which the AO treated as income from other sources rather than invoking ss. 68/69C r.w.s.115BBE. The AO verified ownership of agricultural land, corroborated sales evidence and bank statements, and applied consistent treatment in prior years; ad hoc disallowance of expenses did not render the assessment erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. Accordingly, the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction was quashed, the revision order set aside, the original assessment restored, and the assessee's appeal allowed.
ITAT held that revision under s. 263 by the PCIT was unwarranted where the AO had conducted adequate inquiry and taken a permissible view regarding agricultural receipts and expenditures, which the AO treated as income from other sources rather than invoking ss. 68/69C r.w.s.115BBE. The AO verified ownership of agricultural land, corroborated sales evidence and bank statements, and applied consistent treatment in prior years; ad hoc disallowance of expenses did not render the assessment erroneous or prejudicial to Revenue. Accordingly, the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction was quashed, the revision order set aside, the original assessment restored, and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
