Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's revisional order under section 263 and upholding the taxpayer's claim under section 44B for income from coastal shipping. The Tribunal also accepted the taxpayer's entitlement to exemption under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA in respect of outward freight, concluding that the CIT's exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 was mechanical and without proper application of mind. The ITAT therefore held that such receipts do not accrue or arise in India for the relevant assessment year and directed restoration of the assessment consistent with these conclusions.
The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's revisional order under section 263 and upholding the taxpayer's claim under section 44B for income from coastal shipping. The Tribunal also accepted the taxpayer's entitlement to exemption under Article 8 of the India-Singapore DTAA in respect of outward freight, concluding that the CIT's exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 was mechanical and without proper application of mind. The ITAT therefore held that such receipts do not accrue or arise in India for the relevant assessment year and directed restoration of the assessment consistent with these conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.